THX-1138

The movie is an extended and updated version of George Lucas short movie “Electronic Labyrinth THX 1138 4EB”. The 15 minutes lenght movie was created during Lucas studies in University of Southern California film school in year 1967. As student’s film it’s made very professionaly.

Hi Glam, this is a good point, and you’re right - definitely something I should have mentioned in the review. I must confess that while I listened to the commentary, I haven’t gotten to that extra on the DVD yet. Perhaps some screen caps are in order from it when I do.

George Lucas’s best film, a true work of art. This is PERFECT for those who enjoy post-apocolyptic films in the vein of George Orwell’s masterpiece 1984. This film remains to be one of my all time favorite films, PERIOD. The original, despite its oddly shot “special effects” is solid, though the remake did add a few really good CGI parts and a quite a few absolutely HORRIBLE CGI parts (I.E. the outside dwellers that were originally just hairy midgets are now replaced with things that look like the rejected frames of Golum from LOTR) The car chase scenes look worse than the worst Xbox/PS2 racing game on the market, and some of the city scapes are just a bit overkill, reducing that clostraphobic feeling the original held in with it’s errie lack of colors (everything is white) If you can find a Laserdisc copy of this film JUMP ON IT IMMEDIATELY, but chances are the easiest to get your hands on is the updated version.

Hi Adam, yeah, I have only seen the recent release.

I am writing a paper on Cyberpunk and digital media now, and watched this film (and many others! Joy!!) - I loved it - having already studied visual communication, I loved the almost luminescent white, giving a sterile and cold feel to the whole thing. I was unsure if it fell into the Cyberpunk genre, but thanks to your site, I believe it does! I really wanted confirmation of that, because I really thought, despite the fact that it doesn’t deal so much with digital media, it has all the great elements of cyberpunk - the authoritarian state, the mind drugs, the suppression of things which make us human, the advancement of technology trying to overrule that humanity.

Ther are a few moments in the plot though that lost me - I am unsure how LUH even got into THX’s ‘cell’ to make love to him, after she tells him she is pregnant. Some suggest it is because THX is already dead, and it is an apparition, but I’m still lost on that one.

Anyway, great site! I have been really enjoying it, especially your section on Aeon Flux!

Cheers,
Willie

Hi Willie, thanks for the compliments! Hopefully we see you on more here.

If you can find it, THIS PERFECT DAY (novel) seems to have inspired a lot of THX-1138, right down to the numbered names and emotion-numbing drug treatments. If you got off on this you’ll probably love the book.

[…] For pictures and another review you can check out the THX-1138 Review @ Cyberpunkreview.com. […]

One thing, from my interpretation it’s actually LUH who starts altering THX’s drug regimen so that he becomes more human - motives unknown but presumably she has herself gone off the meds and has fallen in love. I believe SEN also falls in love with THX and uses the medication alteration as an excuse to get LUH removed from the ‘apartment’ she shares with THX.

And don’t forget the hologram who escapes from the entertainment system, one bit of fantasy maybe a bit too far in the scientific sense though the rest might easily happen from a sociological point of view.

This is a good movie…but a bit bland and i think the ending lacks substance. like most i have only seen the ‘new’ version but i can’t imagine the actual movie being much different.

as to the “hologram”, i think maybe he just THINKS he’s a hologram, it would be easy to lose your mind in this sterile society.

ps i really like this site….

There is a remarkable similarity between the plot of this movie and [i]Equilibrium[/i]…

The two versions have their good and bad points. I’ve watched both versions and like both equally and to say the director’s cut has no worth is like you say overkill. Of coarse both versions on DVD would please everybody, The original Wicker Man (1973) directors cut released on DVD with both versions in one package was how THX should have been released. I’ve made a comparison of the original and the directors cut, maybe you will find it interesting.

http://www.maverick-media.co.uk/movies/thx_1138_1971/main.html

I saw this one a few years ago, and judging by Maverick’s comparison images it was the original version I saw.
It’s a good film, and I can understand why some of the changes where made (but not why Lucas choose not to say it was changed, just “restored”). The things they drive through on the highway makes sense, as does some of the robot factory shots and remade holographic stuff, but the addition of all those skyscraper like structures changes the claustrophobic underground tunnels into giant caverns or even dark surface structures, it really changes the feel in my opinion. And the CGI creatures looks horrible.
Both this review and Maverick’s comparison (especially the “Grievances”) where very good.

[…] imdb link cr�tica y valoraci�n cyberpunk review […]

“He begins to cut down on his medication, and convinces his room mate, LUH 3417 to do the same.”
.
.
.isn’t this backwards? doesn’t 3417 first take 1138 off his med?
.
.
.

The problem I have with the “restorations” of both star wars and, since then, THX1138 is the all too apparent danger that people are being misled. I bought the 2004 DVD… I watched it thinking that it was a 1971 picture that I was watching… but as the views presented on me got more and more spectacular my doubts began to gather to the obvious conclusion.

If you didn’t notice yet… a rant is following:

So I watched the included documentary, it’s a really good documentary but… I started to see major differences in the scenes presented there and the movie I just watched…

So that’s what I mean that people are being misled… because NOWHERE on the box does it state that the image has been altered… NOWHERE in the included material does it state this… So for the average viewer this will BE the original movie… This is a 2004 movie and should not be compared to other 1971 movies… because the movie I watched wasn’t the movie they watched, those that originally saw the movie.

As a 2004 movie it’s still really a good movie. I won’t say anything else about that. But they are stating that the film is a 1971 movie and that’s my problem.

In the documentary George Lucas tells about his ordeal in making the movie back in the days when he didn’t have final cut. He described the experience of the execs cutting out 5 minutes as something like “think of your daughter, she’s perfect as you love her. And you love her as she is. Now think if someone came into your life and cut away one of her fingers… and said ‘but she still got 9 left, what are you complaining about?’. But I loved her just as she was. She was perfect… now you made her a cripple!”… Well… I did track down a bootleg of the original release cut on bittorrent… So I have seen the “9-fingered version”… and the “restored 11 fingered version”… But I do wonder… what was she like with only the perfect 10 fingers? the, using GL’s own words, “10-fingered version”.

And technically wise… since it’s a 2004 movie you cannot compare it to 1971 movies in any terms since they didn’t have the VFX-power of 2004… People will get misled. People are going to think that george lucas made this film in 1971 and marvel at the technical brilliance he showed back then.

The two films are quite good. But they do make me think: “Isn’t this a lie?”. What stopped him from putting a subtitle on the cover like “Redux”, “Special Edition” or anything else that would give a hint that the movie has been altered.

That’s my gripe… That’s why I so much prefer Ridley Scotts decision to call his latest cut of Blade Runner the Final Cut to emphasize that what the viewer is watching isn’t the 1982 Original Cut, or the 1992 Directors Cut, or even the Workprint… no…

And that’s my rant on the subject. I like the movies, I just wish that GL would stop being so revisionistic about his own filmography.

Long list of endless!
Absolutely a 10!!!
As one of the rare that I personally would rate 10 +!
Love his movies but this is his masterpiece!

The visuals of the movie are really cool.

The Society of the movie reminds me on the Book Anthem by Ayn Rand. (Numbers instead of names, totally surpressed individuality and all is claimed by the state to be done for morality, humanity etc.)

The clothing of the characters reminds me of prison clothing.