March 10, 2006
Judge Dredd
Year: 1995
Directed by: Danny Cannon
Written by: John Wagner et al. (6 people in total)
Degree of Cyberpunk Visuals: Medium
Correlation to Cyberpunk Themes: Low
Key Cast Members:
Overview: The inspiration for Judge Dredd is based off of a comicbook hero, which Hollywood determined needed to be brought to the big screen. Vice working to recreate the comic (apparently the beginning actually does this pretty well), most of the movie is completely derivative. Judge Dredd is a terrific example of an overblown Hollywood, trying to feed us a pile of crap, all dressed up with a super-hero action star and glitzy FX. The story sucks, the acting sucks, and the overall look is cheesy, but at least the FX and deaths are well done. This only barely qualifies as cyberpunk due to the setting which are made up of Blade Runner and Robocop ripoffs.
Judge Dredd takes place in a twenty-second century dystopia, where anarchy reigns supreme. Now, only the fabled “Judges” keep the peace. Judges are the ultimate authorities – they have the ultimate power in determining someone’s innocence or guilt. Here’s the big surprise that Judge Dredd enlightens us to – “power corrupts.” Stallone is the lone “good guy” who holds to the “Law” at all costs. Unfortunately, he is framed by his evil friend, Rico, a judge he previously sent up the river. Now with Judge Dredd out of the way, Rico has full reign to inflict insane terror over “Mega-City One” (and WOW, what an imaginative name for a cyberpunk city!). I could go through the rest of the plot, but I’m guessing you can probably figure it out – here’s the highlights - escapes with help of sidekicks, kicks ass, uncovers plot, beats more ass, and you can guess the ending.
The Bottom Line: The pacing and tone of Judge Dredd just never seem to click. Sometimes it tries to be serious, yet others it faints to a faux-lite side. Unlike the masterful Save the Green Planet, which is able to blend comedy, horror, Sci-Fi, drama and action with aplumb, Judge Dredd fails in its attempt to be multi-tonal. The FX are very expensive, but you only can enjoy them if you ignore the endless stream of plot holes Judge Dredd presents. On paper, the supporting cast (Diane Lane, Armand Assante, Rob Schneider, Jürgen Prochnow, Max von Sydow) should be terrific (aside for Rob Schneider, of course), but most seem to have a hard time taking their roles seriously. If you haven’t seen Judge Dredd, you might be able to make it through life without doing so. If you have, and think this is one of the greatest movies ever made (as some reviews on Amazon and IMDB indicate), I’m afraid our conversation is at an end. Still, if you realize up front that all you’re getting is a trashy nonsensical story, with a tough Stallone kicking ass in cool ways, you might enjoy it.





Comments
March 11, 2006
David Gentle said:
The comic is meant to be a satire of facism. One story featured a man who decided to grow the biggest nose in Megacity one. Dredd gets invlolved when the nose is stolen.
Note that the comic started in the late ’70s so Robocop and Bladerunner came afterwards.
SFAM said:
Hi David, thanks for the insight - I’ve never read the comic. However, I’m guessing Blade Runner and Robocop did not copy it the look of the comic. I’m guessing the “look” of the comic could have been done without adding a number of throw-away mimicing visuals. But again, this is only a minor issue compared to the story problems. If in fact the movie is also intended as some truly insightful and whitty intellectual satire of facism, count me as one of the fooled.
March 17, 2006
David Gentle said:
I think Robocop was at least partially inspired by Dredd the obviously bladerunner wasn’t.
There are various interviews with the guys who invented Dredd in which they discuss how their original script ideas where totally overun. Your basic Hollywood disaster story of interfering idiots.
David Gentle said:
I never forget that there was an Anthrax song about Dredd (I Am The Law).
Just so you know
SFAM said:
Hi David Gentle, actually I didn’t know about the Anthrax song - that’s pretty cool.
As for the Script ideas being totally over-run by Hollywood Execs, this is hardly surprising in the least. No, the surprising thing with most any movie coming out of Hollywood is when the unique and interesting idea actually survived!
I’m all for good risk assessments to mitigate potential monetary loss, but Hollywood has taken this to such extremes that they end up ruining the project 20 times over. We have numerous examples of this - some movies like Dune, for instance, really don’t even survive in an even slightly intact way even AFTER filming was complete.
This is one reason I spend so much time trying to track down foriegn (to me - meaning outside the US) cyberpunk movies. They generally need to take a risk to succeed, and in the process, often create a wonderful gem of a movie.
March 30, 2007
David said:
4/10? Judge Dredd? No way! This is a classic!
I remember goig to see this twice when it was at the cinema! Sure enough it’s Hollywood, but there’s alot of interesting stuff going off here. The ABC animatronic robot looks alot better than anything computer generated.
Not really sure how you can say this is a low cyberpunk movie SFAM- it has mean machiene in it for pete’s sake.
SFAM said:
Hi David, we definitely have different tastes. For someone who thinks Robocop 2 should be an 8 star movie, it doesn’t surprise me that you feel similarly about Judge Dredd. This is useful to you in that you probably have a good idea how we differ - this should help you interpret whether or not you’ll like a movie based on my review - even if my score for the movie isn’t very hight. Unfortunately, I didn’t find very much interesting occurring from a cyberpunk standpoint. For the most part I found Judge Dredd to be a regular ultra-good tough-guy dystopia movie with a number of poorly thought-out plot points.
Anonymous said:
I personally enjoyed this movie. I’ve never even seen the comic, let alone read it, but this is what I call the TNT classic type movie. Its got great goofy one liners from both Stallone and Schneider, some really great visuals, and Diane Lane in spandex. While its not “cool” its great fun plus, it has a giant pissed off robot, whats not to love? Is it oscar quality? Not a chance, is it even a great movie? HA, but I’ll watch it every time its on.
SFAM said:
Hi Anonymous - I’d agree that many would call Judge Dredd a fun movie to watch.
March 31, 2007
David said:
SFAM-
most of the movies which you have listed by decade ‘are’ classic cyberpunk, very few aren’t )but I have yet to review all of them), but Judge Dredd IS classic cyberpunk.
I have to dmit though, when I was watching the film, I was thinking about the comics the whole time, and comparing the universe of teh comic to that of the film. I reckon Dredd could have been a bit colder though, and I have to say that this is probably my fave stallone movie. Stallone is gradually becoming a joke like Schwazenneger and other movie stars from that time. Bercause it is Stallone as Dredd though, I cannott laugh, because I love the comics all too much.
April 1, 2007
L1zrdking said:
That was me who posted up there about Dredd, forgot to put my name in. But, it looks like Im going to HAVE to track down some of the comics. I might even have to dig around the Walmart dvd junk bin and see if I can find this flick.
April 3, 2007
SFAM said:
Hi David, perhaps I would view this movie differently if I had read the comics. I haven’t though. All I have had to go on is the film. I’ll try tracking them down though and see if this changes my perspective. But as it stands just by watching the film, I just don’t see including this as classic cyberpunk. Would I call it Overblown Hollywood Summer Blockbuster trash? Sure, I’d go for that. I just don’t see much at all insightful or interesting here. Clearly others disagree with me (including you and L1zrdking), and I’m OK with that.
Had we been talking about a few points different from one another, I might even be cajoled into adding a star to my rating, but we’re pretty far apart (4 stars to 8 stars), so I don’t know that this makes sense.
David said:
Judge Dredd is a character that started out in the magazine ‘2000 A.D.’ I think it was released in Britain in 1979, and then they later branched into the USA and Canada. I remember 2000 A.D. sold a shit load more comics in the summer of 95 when the Dredd movie was out, everyone I knew was buying it monthly.
It probably is Hollywood summer blockbuster trash, where artistic endevor is concerned, it’s alot better Hollywood trash than the family laugh along poo that emerges from the LA sesspools before the summer holidays NOW… CUT TO: two and a half months later, and a movie that has cost $40,000,000 ends up in the bargin bin basket at your local pharmacy.
Good bad, Stallone stampering macho bullshit, comic classic, or Hollywood blockbuster poopoo, the cyberpunk visuals in Dredd are pretty ‘high,’ as is the correlation to the cyberpunk theme. Hell, if the Dredd/2000 A.D. universe isn’t cyberpunk, then that makes Dah Taahrminator suitable for airing on children’s Saturday Morning.
April 19, 2007
MasterOfMaloris said:
As a longtime reader of the comics I can say that the film doesnt do them any justice at all, so try not to let the film inform all your opinions on everything to do with Judge Dredd. Also, while the film certainly ripped off more than a few other films, the comics were way ahead of their time in terms of cyberpunk themes.
Whether or not it’s GOOD cyberpunk, I dont know. But they certainly shouldnt be judged (haha) too harshly because of lame hollywood-isms that arent as prevalent in the comics (though admittedly they are there, but it is that kind of comic).
So yes, I’d recommend you try and look at the comics separately.
April 27, 2007
SFAM said:
Hi Master of Moloris, I’ll try to track the comic down.
June 21, 2007
Raffles said:
Story wise Dredd stank. All they took was the basic premise of the comics and added a standard cop movie storyline.
Design wise this has to be one of the best movies out there. I highly suggest the making of books, Especially the art of Kev Walker who was an artist for the comic who also went on to design a lot of the movie. (coincedentally Kev was also a leading artist for Games Workshop which always had a heavy leaning towards cyberpunk)
The stories in the comics were usually either very comic or really dark (think Frank Millar)
It’s really just a shame that the hollywood machine was filtering all the movies of this period till they were shells of a concept. Bear in mind that this was of the same Era as Schumachers Batman movies.
I do have to say that I agree with the rating given here. This film had huge potential to be great but bad choices by the studios ruined it. At least nowadays studios have learned to respect the source material.
July 5, 2007
Wayne Howkins said:
Check out all my videos You’ll find the best metal art sculptures of all your favorite characters. Robocop, Hellboy, Terminator, DarthVader, Alien, Predator…I have them all…8 feet tall and smaller…all made from recycled car truck and motorcycle parts…it’s worth the look.
Wayne
July 14, 2007
Dan Longoria said:
Sadly, those who didn’t like Judge Dredd have no idea how on the mark the film is. Having been a Dredd comic fan since ‘1984, the film captures the essence of what the Dredd universe is about. The one-liners, the outrageous villans, all are all part and parcel of Judge Dredd, the comic.
LIke most critics, unless you know the background of a film, then you should have the guts to say so that way you at least an excuse for your uninformed opinions.
I just wish an extended version of he film were available with the 20 plus minutes of extra footage Sly Stallone had removed so the film would get a “PG-13″ rating, instead of the “R” it did get and didn’t deserve. Again, a critic not doing his job and getting all the facts.
August 10, 2007
Alve said:
i don agree at all that this movie is so little cyberpunk, its cyberpunk almost all throught. the one big mistake in this movie is the music, which is a major drawback for the whole feeling of the movie. if it had the right music it would be a clear 9 stars for me, but now whit this crappy music i give it a 5.
August 18, 2007
Jess said:
Well I agree with both sides of the love / hate the Dredd movie debate. After reading William Gibson and Phillip Dick my whole life I was turned on to 2000ad comics by a friend. The Judge Dredd comics are classic brit humor stabbing out at futurism and fascism, not unlike V for Vendetta strikes out against Thatcherism. The Dredd movie is a great popcorn special effects yeah we had a few laughs kind of film, but really it sucks compared to the real Dredd. Stallone could be Dredd as long as he keeps the helmet on, but since Stallone is Stallone he could never really pull off Dredd. You will note in the comic Dredd never removes his helmet, he is not meant to be ‘human’ in the same respects as other super heros. He is not even a ’super’ he is a machine created by a police state, but he has a soul and a perfect understanding of right and wrong. The battle Dredd fights is between the law and his humanity and the law is always right. Dredd is a perfect law enforcer and he suffers for it. If the comics borrow from anyone it is Phillip Dick, you have Conapts, pre-cogs and battle droids that make Star Wars droids look like kindergarten lunch room punks. It is true, Diane Lane was the best thing about this movie. Don’t waste your time with this movie but do turn on to the 2000AD comics, there is much “cyberpunk” worthy material there.
Jess
September 2, 2007
Alberto said:
The movie dont was a great thing, but some ingredients of it was so good. Maybe the comics about it, are more extensive than the movie. To dark, dont?
May 20, 2008
scott brown said:
hi polie me scott brown
jude dredd see on
May 21, 2008
Adam Daub said:
Another comic book movie gone horribly wrong with horrible acting, horrible plot, etc.
Oh wait, I think I recall an argument with a huge comic-movie fan that exclaimed “The acting is supposed to be campy!” trying to convience me that quote : “It gives it more of a comic feeling.”
I guess when I was young and read comics I never really allowed myself to believe that the characters in them were lousy and downright laughable.
Anok Panda said:
As a big fan of the comics before the movie came out, I was truly disappointed with this flick. Stallone had the perfect jaw to play Dredd. All he had to due was punch people in the face, fire his gun and say “I am the law.” Not to say his part was any more than that, but he sucks and they should have used him simply as a prop to tell a better story. The comic had many one shots and sagas, many of which could have been used to make a better, and more cyberpunk, movie. Many elements of cyberpunk existed in the comic, it all depended on the writer/ artist team behind any particular story. Sometimes the comics really sucked, the producers decided to use only the aspects from those shallowest of stories to make their movie.
The main thought I had behind my post here was to say that the “world” of judge dredd would make a great cyberpunk back drop, including the judges. But, to be great and optimize the cyberpunk value, it would have to have someone else (not Dredd) as the main character.
Stallone takes growth hormones, most likely uses the internet with a powerful connection speed, I’m guessing he shoots off a round or two from a shinny hand gun, lives in a world with economically powerful Asain countries, resides in a nation with a Department of Homeland Security and is on a planet with a near death ecosystem, thus giving his dumb ass more “Correlation to Cyberpunk Themes” than this movie.
Lastly, mean machine bleeds cyberpunk themes.
June 13, 2008
Kris said:
Hi,
the problem is that the comic has second and third degree. Seems that Stallone and the producers completely missed the “finesse” of the comic. I’m a long time fan of the comic, so the movie was a real disapointement for me.
December 8, 2008
Fawzie Kefli said:
The real problem is that stories in one medium do not always translate well into another medium. When “The Watchmen” comes out later in 2009, prepare to see a lot of disappointed comic fans (again). This is (one of) the reason(s) that Alan Moore, the writer of “The Watchmen”, does not want anything to do with the film.
Withe regards to the Dredd film, if you saw it and did not like it, and have not read the comics, then do NOT read the comics at all. Then you’ll REALLY hate the movie.
Personally, I was hoping for a sequel with Pamella Anderson as Judge Cassandra “Cass the Ass” Anderson.She would’ve really fitted her, uh, shoes.
Aphex said:
Having grown up with Dredd in comic book form, I must point out that only in the earlier days was Dredd as campy as in this film (and even then, it was in an elaborate, satirical and knowing way - check out ‘The Cursed Earth’ arc for example, with the pisstake Sex Pistol punk-biker character called, naturally, Sid).
Latter-day Dredd could be ludicrous, sure (the things that are illegal in Mega-City One for example; whole stories about illegal Goldfish, priceless broken saucepans or equally farcical items), but it could also be subtle and very deft, even poignant (try ‘The Scorpion Dance’ arc - fantastically written, and wonderfully drawn).
The odd thing about Dredd, for me, is that only rarely do we ever get to see him as being human (one of the reasons that you never see his head above the mouth) - he’s dehumanised so that he becomes this totemic lawgiver, who isn’t even particularly likeable (he’ll shoot people without remorse for the most trivial things, he is completely inflexible and almost senselessly brutal), but ultimately he’s someone you want to see win because he represents a sense of order in a malign and wildy dystopian society.
Sly Stallone just gurned a lot, punched some heads and slurred ‘I Am The Law’. The only good thing about this film was the Angel Gang, and then only visually.
As an aside, Rico, the villain, was actually originally Joe Dredd’s cloned brother. Rico’s descent into corruption, and Dredd’s inability to forgive it, are what make him so inflexible where the law is concerned. Why this was not included in the film is, frankly, baffling…
Seriously though - read the comics; they’re far better, and far more Cyberpunk.
Aphex said:
Hang on, it wasn’t Sid, it was Spikes Harvey Rotten (other Pistol… oops…)
January 26, 2009
Yautja said:
I like this movie. Sure it’s quite cheesy, but I don’t mind it, many movies tend to be that. I can understand if you don’t like it, but I would’ve at least give it high cyberpunk visuals and themes. C’mon, dystopian future, robots, cyborgs, clones, megacorporation, dark city streets with neon lights… what’s NOT cyberpunk about it? Well, then again I have a bad taste in movies, heh. I’ve only read a couple of the comics.
January 30, 2009
Adoe said:
Just to cheer you up, they are currently looking a remaking JD. Hopefully this time we will get the JD movie we want without the mumbling Stallone.
As for 2000AD in general a comic of epic imagination. I wish I still read it but one moves on. Check out Nemesis, ABC Warriors and Strontium Dog!!!
April 20, 2009
Judge Giant said:
This movie was worse than the Apocalypse War total nuke out. Stallone was horrendous. Clint Eastwood would have been a better choice since he is one of the best at portraying those types of characters(less verbal, more physical/expressive). I would have liked a movie with the quality of Bladerunner. The comics are a great study of human nature. The earlier comics were campy, but they did set up the storyline and evolved nicely.
September 3, 2009
Truth_Seeker said:
I actually enjoy watching Judje Dredd. Despite the bad acting and lame script, it has some of the best visuals in the genre. It also deals with many philosophic topics, such as overpopulation of the mega cities, lack of real judicial system and social segregation. The biggest mistake of the producers was that the movie was decided as a comedy.